Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An efficient, well-structured diagnostic skill that assumes Claude's competence and centers a clean-control validation gate. It is held just below 5 on actionability and workflow clarity because portions of the guidance are directives rather than fully executable steps with explicit retry loops.
Suggestions
Convert key directives into concrete commands where possible (e.g., give the actual port-kill command instead of 'Kill by port') to push actionability toward 5.
Add an explicit validate→retry loop for the non-reproducing case ('repeat both sides; if still divergent, label flaky') to reach anchor-5 workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Terse, dense bullets with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries project-specific signal ('Kill by port, not process name'). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready bash (git worktree control) and concrete per-signature responses, but a meaningful share of the guidance is directive ('Quote the...', 'Classify as...') rather than executable commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (capture → clean control → classify → forensics) with the clean control acting as an explicit validation gate and branch logic, but it lacks the formatted validate→fix→retry feedback loop of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized SKILL.md with four clear section headers and no nested or buried references; no external files are needed, matching the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |