Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured workflow with concrete commands and explicit validation checkpoints, scoring near the top; the only gap is unresolved path placeholders and the absence of an error-recovery loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and direct with no over-explanation of what a worktree is or how git works; every line is an actionable instruction, matching 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place.' | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, real commands (git worktree list, cd, pwd, git branch --show-current) but leaves placeholders such as '<repo-root>' and unsubstituted 'WORKTREE'/'NAME', so it is not fully copy-paste ready — fitting 'mostly executable guidance; minor gaps' rather than the fully executable score 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (Resolve, Switch cwd, Report) with explicit validation stops in steps 1 and 2, but the validation 'stop with an error' lacks a fix-and-retry feedback loop, so it falls short of the score 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A sub-50-line, single-purpose skill with no need for external references and clean section organization (## Steps, numbered ### subsections), which the simple-skill exception allows to score 5 on progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |