Audit a documentation site for agent-friendliness: discovery, markdown delivery, crawlability, semantic structure, machine-readable surfaces, and content legibility. Use when asked to assess docs.docker.com or any docs site for AI/agent readiness, produce a scored report, compare with external scanners, or generate a remediation list. Triggers on: "audit docs for agent readiness", "how agent-friendly is docs.docker.com", "score our docs for AI agents", "review llms.txt / markdown / crawlability", "create an agent-readiness remediation plan".
74
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly defines a specific niche (documentation site agent-friendliness auditing), lists concrete capabilities across multiple dimensions, and provides explicit trigger guidance with natural user phrases. It uses proper third-person voice throughout and would be easily distinguishable from other skills in a large skill library.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: audit for discovery, markdown delivery, crawlability, semantic structure, machine-readable surfaces, content legibility, produce scored reports, compare with external scanners, generate remediation lists. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (audit documentation sites for agent-friendliness across six dimensions, produce scored reports, compare with scanners, generate remediation lists) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause plus specific trigger phrases). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes excellent natural trigger phrases users would actually say, such as 'audit docs for agent readiness', 'score our docs for AI agents', 'review llms.txt / markdown / crawlability', and 'create an agent-readiness remediation plan'. Covers multiple natural variations. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive niche — auditing documentation sites specifically for AI/agent readiness is a very specific domain. The triggers reference unique concepts like 'llms.txt', 'agent-readiness', and 'crawlability' that are unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, highly actionable audit skill with clear workflow sequencing and appropriate progressive disclosure. Its main weakness is moderate verbosity—some conditional logic around host types and Docker-specific guidance could be tightened. Overall it's a strong skill that provides concrete, executable guidance for a complex multi-step audit process.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is generally well-written and avoids explaining basic concepts, but it's somewhat verbose for what it conveys. Several sections include hedging and conditional explanations (e.g., the Docker-specific MCP paragraph, repeated reminders about docs-only vs app hosts) that could be tightened. However, it largely respects Claude's intelligence and doesn't over-explain fundamentals. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete, executable guidance throughout: specific bash commands with arguments, exact file paths to check (/llms.txt, /robots.txt, /sitemap.xml), specific sampling criteria (at least 12 pages, named page types), explicit fetch-path checks to perform, and references to a bundled script and rubric. The instructions are specific enough to act on immediately. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9-step workflow is clearly sequenced with logical progression from scoping → gathering signals → sampling → checking → scoring → comparing → remediating → reporting. Validation is embedded throughout (e.g., 'score only what you verified', 'trust the live fetch' over scanners, verify actual markdown paths rather than assuming). The priority-based remediation list (P0/P1/P2) provides a clear feedback mechanism for findings. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill appropriately references external files for detailed content: the rubric is in references/rubric.md, the report template is in references/report-template.md, and the baseline probe script is in scripts/baseline-probes.sh. These are one-level-deep, clearly signaled references. The main SKILL.md stays at the right level of overview while delegating specifics to supporting files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
2ea4a02
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.