Push the current branch and create a pull request against docker/docs. Use after changes are committed and reviewed. "create a PR", "submit the fix", "open a pull request for this".
90
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Push the branch and create a properly structured pull request.
git log --oneline main..HEAD # confirm commits exist
git diff --quiet # confirm no unstaged changesConfirm origin points to your fork, not upstream:
git remote get-url originThen push:
git push -u origin <branch-name>Before creating a PR for an issue, check whether that issue already has an open linked PR:
gh api repos/docker/docs/issues/<issue-number>/timeline --paginate \
--jq '.[] | select((.event=="cross-referenced" or .event=="connected" or .event=="referenced") and .source.issue.pull_request and .source.issue.state=="open") | {url: .source.issue.html_url, title: .source.issue.title}'If this returns an open PR that addresses the same issue, stop. Don't open a duplicate PR; report the existing PR instead. Only proceed if there is no open linked PR, or if the existing PR clearly does not address the issue and you explain why in the new PR body.
Derive the fork owner dynamically:
FORK_OWNER=$(git remote get-url origin | sed -E 's|.*[:/]([^/]+)/[^/]+(\.git)?$|\1|')gh pr create --repo docker/docs \
--head "${FORK_OWNER}:<branch-name>" \
--title "<concise summary under 70 chars>" \
--body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<1-2 sentences: what was wrong and what was changed>
Closes #NNNN
Generated by <active coding agent name>
EOF
)"Keep the body short. Reviewers need to know what changed and why — nothing else.
Use an accurate disclosure footer that names the active coding agent, for
example Generated by Codex or Generated by Claude Code.
If while working on this PR you discovered something non-obvious about the repo — a convention not documented in AGENTS.md, a gotcha that tripped you up, a pattern that should be codified — add a Learnings section to the PR body:
## Learnings
- <what you learned and why it matters>Add this section between the Summary and the Closes line. Only include
learnings that would help future contributors avoid the same issue. Do not
include things already documented in AGENTS.md or STYLE.md.
The weekly PR learnings scanner reads these sections to surface recurring patterns for the team to codify.
Use the Issues API for labels — gh pr edit --add-label silently fails:
gh api repos/docker/docs/issues/<pr-number>/labels \
--method POST \
--field 'labels[]=status/review'Request review:
gh pr edit <pr-number> --repo docker/docs --add-reviewer docker/docs-teamVerify the reviewer was assigned:
gh pr view <pr-number> --repo docker/docs --json reviewRequests \
--jq '.reviewRequests[].slug'If the team doesn't appear, use the API directly:
gh api repos/docker/docs/pulls/<pr-number>/requested_reviewers \
--method POST --field 'team_reviewers[]=docs-team'Print the PR URL and current CI state:
gh pr view <pr-number> --repo docker/docs --json url,state
gh pr checks <pr-number> --repo docker/docs --json name,stateCloses #NNNN (not "Fixes") for GitHub auto-close linkagec0aa985
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.