Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, executable workflow with concrete commands, explicit validation checkpoints, and clean sectioning. It assumes Claude's competence and avoids unnecessary explanation throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is command-first and lean; it does not explain git/PR concepts Claude already knows, and the surrounding prose is actionable rather than padded. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Every step is backed by fully executable git and gh commands with concrete flags and clearly marked placeholders, making the guidance copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (verify, push, create, label/review, report) with explicit validation checkpoints and stop conditions, including duplicate-PR and reviewer-assignment feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file organized into well-labeled sections with no nested references; content is appropriately inline for a single-task workflow skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |