Write a documentation fix on a branch. Makes the minimal change, formats, self-reviews, and commits. Use after research has identified what to change. "write the fix", "make the changes", "implement the fix for #1234".
94
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
99%
1.35xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
92%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong description that clearly communicates the skill's purpose, workflow steps, and when to use it. The inclusion of example trigger phrases is excellent. The main weakness is that some trigger terms ('make the changes', 'implement the fix') are generic enough to potentially conflict with non-documentation fix skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: writes a documentation fix on a branch, makes minimal changes, formats, self-reviews, and commits. These are clear, actionable steps. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (writes documentation fix, formats, self-reviews, commits) and when ('Use after research has identified what to change') with explicit trigger examples. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural trigger phrases users would actually say: 'write the fix', 'make the changes', 'implement the fix for #1234'. These are realistic user utterances that map well to the skill's purpose. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While it specifies 'documentation fix' and 'on a branch', phrases like 'make the changes' and 'implement the fix' are fairly generic and could overlap with code fix skills or other implementation-oriented skills. The documentation focus helps but the trigger phrases are broad. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted, highly actionable skill with a clear sequential workflow, explicit validation steps, and lean prose that respects Claude's intelligence. The commit message template and lint verification steps are particularly strong. The only weakness is that referenced style guides (CLAUDE.md, STYLE.md, COMPONENTS.md) are mentioned without links or bundle support, slightly weakening progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Link referenced files (CLAUDE.md, STYLE.md, COMPONENTS.md) with relative markdown links so Claude can navigate to them, or note they exist in the project root.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section is lean and purposeful. No unnecessary explanations of what git, linting, or front matter are. Instructions assume Claude's competence throughout and each token contributes actionable value. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides executable bash commands for branching, linting, staging, and committing. The commit message template is copy-paste ready with a complete heredoc structure. Specific file paths and naming conventions are given. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 6-step sequential workflow with explicit validation checkpoints: Prettier runs automatically post-edit, manual lint after all edits, self-review with git diff before committing. The feedback loop is present — fix lint errors, re-verify with git diff. The staged-files verification step prevents accidental commits. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to CLAUDE.md, STYLE.md, and COMPONENTS.md are mentioned but not linked. No bundle files are provided to support these references. The content is well-organized with clear sections, but the external references are not clearly signaled as navigable links. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
2ea4a02
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.