Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-built, information-dense body with one executable core example and honest platform caveats. Its main weakness is the missing feedback loops in the publish-and-create workflow, plus some repeated cross-references and inline detail that would fit better in dedicated bundle files.
Suggestions
Add validation checkpoints to the publish workflow: after POST /api/extensions/beta/extensions, check the response status and re-GET the extension to confirm it is enabled and mounted before declaring success; include error-recovery guidance for common failures.
Consolidate the four repetitions of 'confirm paths/routes in API-SPECS.md (public routes)' into a single 'Related API reference' note to trim redundancy.
Move the platform caveats and prerequisites tables into a references/ file (e.g., references/caveats.md) and keep one-line pointers in SKILL.md, deepening the progressive-disclosure structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes platform familiarity — no padding explaining what Domino or Apps are — but carries minor redundancy: 'confirm paths/routes in API-SPECS.md (public routes)' is repeated four times, and the auth code block restates the host/proxy logic already in the auth table. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The create-Extension REST example is copy-paste ready (env-var host resolution, token fetch, realistic body with uiMountPointTypeConfigs), and mount-point keys plus 'renderIFrame = !deepLinkingEnabled' are concrete. Gaps: the Apps publish chain and official-install operations are named and delegated to other files rather than shown, leaving minor holes in executable coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-step publish workflow ('1. Build the App... 2. Publish the App... 3. Create the Extension') is clearly sequenced, but there are no validation checkpoints — the REST call has no status/error handling and nothing verifies the Extension is enabled or visible — matching 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit' rather than the level above. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body acts as an overview pushing detail one level deep through clearly signaled links (API-SPECS.md, API-APPS.md, official GitHub repos with 'read the file matching your Domino version'). However, no bundle files of its own exist, so inline material like the caveats and prerequisites tables is exactly what a references/ file could absorb — good structure with minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |