Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured skill body: a five-step workflow with checklists, concrete file paths and templates, and an explicit when-not-to-use section. The main residual gaps are minor redundancy between the pitfalls table and checklists, and the absence of an inline error-recovery loop after the Step 5 verification checklist.
Suggestions
Add a one-line feedback loop after the Step 5 checklist (e.g., 'If any check fails, fix the file and re-run the full checklist') to earn full workflow-clarity credit.
Trim overlap between the 'Common Pitfalls' table and the Step 1/Step 5 checklist items by keeping each point in only one place.
Include a minimal inline eval.yaml skeleton (2-3 lines) in Step 5 so the harness-eval step is executable without opening the external README.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient overall — concrete rules, tables, and templates with almost no padding — but the 'Common Pitfalls' table partially repeats checklist items from Steps 1 and 5 (applyTo breadth, vague guidance), and the 'Recommended sections' template is lightly padded. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable: exact paths ('.github/instructions/<topic>.instructions.md'), a concrete YAML frontmatter template, example applyTo globs, and a deterministic eval-id naming rule. The Vally eval step, however, defers execution to an external 'eng/harness-evaluation/README.md' rather than giving even a minimal inline skeleton. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear five-step sequence with explicit investigation checkboxes (Step 1) and a verification checklist (Step 5), but there is no feedback loop saying what to do when a checklist item fails (fix and re-verify), and eval validation is delegated to the external README. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed at this scale; sections are well-organized with clear headers, and the single deeper material (harness eval rules) is correctly pushed to a one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference ('eng/harness-evaluation/README.md') rather than inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |