Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, actionable, and concise, with a clear five-step workflow culminating in a validation checklist. It consistently sits at the strong-but-not-exemplary tier across dimensions, mainly lacking an explicit error-recovery loop and finer trimming.
Suggestions
Add an explicit error-recovery feedback loop in Step 5 (e.g., 'If the YAML is invalid, fix and re-validate before proceeding') to push workflow_clarity toward 5.
Tighten the meta-guidance bullets in Step 4 and the Recommended sections list to reduce minor verbosity and lift conciseness.
Include one short inline do/don't code example for the body content (mirroring the applyTo pitfall example) to make actionability fully copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, but a few list items and the meta-guidance bullets could be trimmed further, placing it just below the fully lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance (YAML frontmatter template, file-path patterns, applyTo globs, a do/don't pitfall example), with only minor gaps relative to the fully executable 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–5 are clearly sequenced and Step 5 provides an explicit validation checklist, but there is no error-recovery/retry feedback loop, which keeps it below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized file with clear sections and no need for external references (none exist), with only minor organization gaps versus the ideal one-level-deep reference structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |