Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instruction-only triage skill with concrete label taxonomy and an explicit pre-write approval checkpoint. It could be strengthened with a sample completed label+comment example and a revision loop.
Suggestions
Add one short worked example showing a final label set and drafted comment for a representative bug issue to make the common case copy-paste ready.
Include a small feedback/retry step for when the user requests changes to the drafted comment or labels before approval.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient across ~40 lines; assumes Claude's competence with no padded concept explanations (e.g., no definition of what a GitHub issue or label is), and every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance (explicit label taxonomy with criteria, exact comment contents to draft, explicit approval gate), but lacks copy-paste-ready examples of an actual label set or comment draft for the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence with a validation checkpoint ('Show the exact labels and comment before any write') and an explicit approval gate before writes; minor gap is the absence of a feedback/retry loop for when the maintainer requests changes to the draft. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple, well-organized skill under 50 lines with no need for external references; sections (Inputs, Labels, Workflow) are cleanly structured and all content is appropriately inline per the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |