Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear validated workflow and a clean one-level reference to the real verification script. Its main weakness is verbosity from duplicated command examples, decorative ASCII output boxes, and a 'What It Does' section that restates the workflow.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated command examples in Mode 1 and Mode 2 since Step 2 already constructs the command; keep only the mode-specific flag deltas.
Replace or trim the ASCII-art output boxes in 'Expected Output'; a one-line description of each marker is sufficient.
Consider folding 'What It Does' into the existing Workflow steps to avoid restating the same sequence twice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but padded: the Mode 1/2 command examples duplicate Step 2, the ASCII-art output boxes are decorative, and 'What It Does' re-narrates the workflow already covered in the steps. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable copy-paste PowerShell commands per mode, a real referenced script (verify-tests-fail.ps1), a troubleshooting table, and documented optional parameters covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence with explicit result interpretation, feedback loops (Blocked status, 'do not manually mutate the worktree'), and validation for the destructive git-revert operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned with a single one-level-deep reference to the real scripts/verify-tests-fail.ps1; minor organization gaps where inline bulk (output examples, 'What It Does') could be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |