Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise instruction skill with concrete classification guidance and a clear clarification gate. Adding an explicit ADR output-validation step and ensuring referenced files are bundled would push it to full marks.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validate/review checkpoint after drafting the ADR (e.g. verify section taxonomy is correctly applied and the Decision TL;DR is present) before considering the ADR complete.
Bundle the referenced adr-format.md (or a stub) so the one-level-deep reference actually resolves, improving navigation for progressive_disclosure.
Number the core workflow steps (read adr-format -> run clarification gate -> classify inputs -> draft -> validate) so the sequence is an explicit ordered checklist rather than prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instruction-only with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries actionable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, specific guidance: an explicit section taxonomy with definitions ("`Context` = pre-decision facts…", "`Analysis` = the clarified reasoning…"), a named handoff target, and an unambiguous gating rule — fully actionable for an instruction skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence exists (read adr-format, run the clarification gate, classify inputs, draft sections) with a re-run checkpoint ("Re-run this gate whenever later ADR drafting exposes a new important open decision"), but there is no explicit output-validation step on the drafted ADR itself, a minor gap for a document-manipulation skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized with clear sectioning and one-level-deep references (adr-format.md, the clarify-task skill), but the referenced adr-format.md is not actually present in the bundle, a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |