Conciseness

Lean checklists that supply domain specifics Claude would not reliably infer (Tier 1/Tier 2 sources, @dr5hn escalation, >100-record threshold) without explaining basic concepts, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'; it is not level 2 because there is no unnecessary padding or concept explanation.

Actionability

Provides a copy-paste-ready review output template plus concrete flag patterns and decision thresholds; per the code-vs-instruction scoring note, the absence of code is not penalized because the guidance is concrete and executable, matching 'fully executable... copy-paste ready' for an instruction skill.

Workflow Clarity

A clear six-step sequence (Step 1–Step 6) with explicit decision checkpoints via the Recommendation triage and Escalation Criteria sections, matching 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps'; it is not capped at 2 because this is a review/assessment task rather than a destructive or batch operation requiring a validate-fix-retry loop.

Progressive Disclosure

A single well-organized SKILL.md with clearly headed sections and no external references to chase; since no bundle files exist and the content is appropriately self-contained, it matches the 'well-organized sections' allowance for simple skills rather than the over-structured or nested-reference level 2.

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "review of geographic data PRs", "code review on contributions", "checking if data makes geographical sense", "geographic plausibility checks", "suspicious pattern detection" — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor, not the level 2 'names domain and some actions' anchor.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ("Perform an intelligent review of geographic data PRs beyond schema validation") and when ("Use this skill whenever reviewing a data PR... Trigger on: ..."), matching the 'clearly answers both what AND when with explicit triggers' anchor; the 'Use when' clause is present so it is not capped at 2.

Trigger Term Quality

Good coverage of natural phrasing a user would say — "review this PR", "does this look right", "is this data correct", "quality assessment requests" — matching the 'good coverage of natural terms' anchor rather than the partial-coverage level 2.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (geographic data PR review, contributions/ directory, schema-validation contrast) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor rather than the overlap-prone level 2.