Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable code and a well-validated, clearly sequenced workflow, but it pays for this in token efficiency by duplicating every section bilingually and keeping all reference material inline in one ~1900-line monolith with no progressive disclosure to separate files.
Suggestions
Remove or externalize the <!--zh ... --> Chinese duplicate blocks; if bilingual content is required, move the secondary language into a separate reference file so each token earns its place.
Split the large reference material (Core Tools and Parameters, Tool Parameter Format Specifications, image_search Keyword Strategy) into separate bundled files under references/ and link to them one level deep from a concise overview, improving progressive disclosure.
Tighten explanatory prose in sections like Visual Hierarchy and Default Design Mindset into terse rule lists so the guidance stays actionable without the padding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is heavily padded: every section is duplicated as English prose plus a full Chinese translation inside <!--zh ... --> comments, roughly doubling token cost; core guidance is domain-specific and useful, but the bilingual duplication and some explanatory prose could be tightened, so it is 'mostly efficient but includes unnecessary context' rather than a verbose concept-explainer. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready examples — complete `tool.call('create_slide_project', {...})` calls with full parameter payloads, a complete HTML slide template, `analysis_js` bodies, and `shell_exec(command=...)` commands — plus exhaustive parameter tables for each tool; not score 2 because the code is real and complete rather than pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Complete Creation Workflow is a clearly sequenced 5-step process with a per-slide sub-loop, and validation is built in via the browser-executed `analysis_js` quality check with an explicit 'fix at most once, if unresolved continue' feedback loop, satisfying the anchor for explicit validation steps and error recovery. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At ~1900 lines this is a single monolithic file with no bundle files and zero external references; section headers provide decent navigation, but large blocks that could live in separate reference files (tool parameter formats, image/keyword strategy, format specs) are all inline, matching 'content that should be separate is inline'; not score 1 because organization is genuinely clear, not score 3 because nothing is split out for a skill far exceeding 50 lines. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |