Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable review workflow with a clear step sequence and explicit validation checkpoints, assuming Claude's competence throughout. The only slight gap is progressive disclosure — the long heuristic list is inline rather than split into a referenced file.
Suggestions
Consider moving the H1–H16 heuristic definitions into a referenced HEURISTICS.md so the SKILL.md body reads as the overview workflow, leaving the core steps and tone guidance inline.
Trim or compress the ASCII diagram template (Step 3) to the minimum scaffold needed, since the surrounding prose already describes each element to include.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence (no explanations of what an API or module is), with tight heuristic definitions; the generous ASCII diagram template and a few bad/good examples are minor extras that mostly earn their place but keep it just short of fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout — exact Asana opt_fields, a copy-paste-ready diagram template, per-heuristic bad/good Kotlin examples, exact module placement rules, and an enumerated exceptions list — fully actionable for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (Step 2's stop-and-ask on unresolved module locations, "Do not proceed...") and a Step 1 understanding checklist; the operation is read-only analysis so the destructive-cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references, but the 16 inline heuristics are substantial content that could optionally live in a one-level-deep reference file; structure is good with a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |