CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

brand-guidelines

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

95

6.18x
Quality

56%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

6.18x

Average score across 10 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./docs/v19.7/configuration/agent/skills_external/antigravity-awesome-skills-main/skills/brand-guidelines-community/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

22%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill functions as a brand reference card listing Anthropic's colors and fonts, but critically lacks actionable guidance — there are no code examples, no workflow steps, and no concrete instructions for how Claude should actually apply these brand elements to artifacts. The content is moderately well-organized but suffers from redundancy across sections (font fallback info repeated three times) and provides descriptions of behavior rather than executable instructions.

Suggestions

Add executable code examples showing how to apply brand colors and fonts (e.g., python-pptx code for styling a slide, HTML/CSS for web artifacts, SVG styling examples).

Define a clear workflow: e.g., 1) Identify artifact type, 2) Apply color palette, 3) Apply typography, 4) Verify visual output — with concrete code at each step.

Remove redundant sections — consolidate font fallback information into a single location and eliminate the 'Features' section that restates the guidelines.

Add at least one complete before/after example showing an unstyled artifact being transformed with brand styling.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

There is some redundancy — font fallback behavior is mentioned in multiple sections (Typography, Smart Font Application, Font Management), and the 'Features' section largely restates what's already in 'Brand Guidelines'. The keywords line is unnecessary filler. However, the color/typography reference values themselves are appropriately concise.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides no executable code, no concrete commands, and no examples of how to actually apply the brand styling. It describes what happens ('Applies Poppins font to headings') but never shows how to do it — no python-pptx code snippets, no function calls, no copy-paste-ready examples. Mentioning 'RGBColor class' without showing usage is vague direction, not actionable guidance.

1 / 3

Workflow Clarity

There is no workflow, no sequenced steps, and no process for applying brand styling to an artifact. The content reads as a reference sheet of brand values and feature descriptions, but never tells Claude what to do first, second, or how to validate the result.

1 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is organized into logical sections (Colors, Typography, Features, Technical Details), which provides some structure. However, there are no references to external files, no bundle files exist, and the repeated information across sections suggests the content could be better organized. For a skill with no bundle, the structure is adequate but not exemplary.

2 / 3

Total

6

/

12

Passed

Description

89%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong description that clearly communicates its purpose and when to use it. It has excellent trigger term coverage and distinctiveness. The only minor weakness is that the specificity of capabilities could be slightly more concrete by listing additional specific actions beyond 'applies brand colors and typography.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Anthropic brand styling) and some actions ('applies brand colors and typography'), but doesn't list multiple specific concrete actions like listing specific colors, specifying which artifact types, or detailing typography rules.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to artifacts) and 'when' (explicitly states 'Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply').

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'brand colors', 'style guidelines', 'visual formatting', 'company design standards', 'Anthropic', 'look-and-feel', and 'typography'. These cover a good range of how users might phrase requests.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive — specifically scoped to Anthropic's brand identity, which is a clear niche unlikely to conflict with other skills. The mention of 'Anthropic's official brand colors' makes it unmistakably unique.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
duclm1x1/Dive-Ai
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.