Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable workflow with concrete CLI commands and clear output templates. Its main weaknesses are a redundant Guardrails section and the absence of an explicit verification checkpoint in the per-task implementation loop.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step in the task loop (e.g. run tests or re-run `openspec status` and confirm the change builds) before flipping `- [ ]` to `- [x]`.
Remove or deduplicate the Guardrails bullets that restate the step 6 pause conditions and 'keep changes minimal'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but the Guardrails section largely restates step 6's pause conditions and 'keep changes minimal', which could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste CLI commands, named JSON fields, and concrete checkbox-flip actions with output templates; the core 'make the code changes' is necessarily abstract by task nature. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven steps are clearly sequenced with state handling, but this batch operation (looping through tasks making code changes) has no verification/test checkpoint before marking tasks complete, capping the score per the batch-operation rule. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained SKILL.md with well-signaled sections and no need for external references; minor organization gaps from redundant guardrails and lengthy inline output templates. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |