Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, fully executable workflow with well-organized sections and concrete commands throughout. Its only soft spot is the absence of an explicit validation/verification step before showing the first artifact, though the STOP directive mitigates the risk.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, action-oriented body that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining what OpenSpec or schemas are; every line is a directive, command, or guardrail that earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready CLI commands (openspec new change, status, instructions) with concrete flags and example output expectations covering the standard flow. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with an explicit STOP checkpoint and guardrails for invalid/duplicate names, but it relies on the user's status output for validation rather than an automated verify step, leaving a minor checkpoint gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the body is a single well-organized overview under ~50 lines with clear sections (Input, Steps, Output, Guardrails), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |