Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow with explicit validation and confirmation gates for a destructive move operation. The main improvement is tightening the redundant Guardrails section and making date generation a concrete command.
Suggestions
Remove Guardrails items that restate the numbered steps; keep only the non-obvious guardrails (e.g. preserve .openspec.yaml, agent-driven sync) to improve conciseness.
Provide a concrete command or expression for deriving the YYYY-MM-DD target name instead of "Generate target name using current date".
Consider extracting the large sync-prompt logic in step 4 into a referenced file if this skill grows, to set up progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and relies on concrete commands, but the Guardrails section reiterates points already stated in the numbered steps and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands (`openspec list --json`, `mkdir -p`, `mv ...`) and named tools (AskUserQuestion, Task) make guidance mostly executable; the "Generate target name using current date" step lacks a concrete command. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly numbered steps include validation gates (artifact/task status checks, target-exists guard) and confirmation loops, but checkpoints are soft confirmations rather than a validate-fix-retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the single SKILL.md is well organized into Input, Steps, Output, and Guardrails sections; minor redundancy between Guardrails and the steps keeps it just short of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |