Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured overview with concrete commands and a clear workflow that includes validation checkpoints, deferring detail to a single well-signaled reference. Adding an inline commit-message example and explicit feedback-loop language would push it to full marks.
Suggestions
Include one concrete Chinese commit-message example inline (e.g. '优化 ET skills 路由与参考文档') so the '动作 + 对象 + 影响范围/原因' format is immediately actionable.
Make the validate→fix→retry loop explicit in the body for risky operations (e.g. 'rebase 冲突 → 解决 → git rebase --continue → 再次检查 staged diff') rather than relying on the reference file.
The '优先入口' command list duplicates commands already implied by '默认动作'; consider merging to tighten token use further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, sectioned body that assumes Claude's git competence — '红线:禁止直接使用 git pull', short bullet steps — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands are listed verbatim ('git status --short', 'git diff --staged', 'git pull --rebase') and the 6-step default action sequence is actionable, but no inline commit-message example is shown in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence with an explicit re-check checkpoint (step 4 re-examines staged diff before commit) and a risk-explain-before-execute checkpoint (step 6); validation is present so the destructive/batch cap does not apply, though explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops are only weakly emphasized in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and a single, clearly signaled one-level reference ('references/et-git-workflow.md' under '按需补读') whose file exists in the bundle. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |