CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

env-hub

Save a finished Claude Code or Codex session as a Harbor task (an agent benchmark task) and submit it to Env Hub, which turns it into an environment by writing its verifier and reference solution. Use when the user asks to "save this session as a Harbor task", "turn this into a Harbor task or environment", "submit this to Env Hub", "保存为 Harbor 任务", or to check how a submitted task is going or list their environments.

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an exemplary operational skill: lean, copy-paste-ready commands verified against the bundled script, a clearly sequenced workflow with consent and secret-detection checkpoints plus error-recovery guidance, and appropriate structure with no content that belongs elsewhere. It assumes Claude's competence and adds only skill-specific knowledge.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~85-line body is telegraphic and operational throughout; nothing explains concepts Claude already knows, and even asides earn their place (e.g., "the hub may not be the default one" justifies "give that address, never one of your own"). "Python 3.9+, standard library only" is a durable runtime requirement, not time-sensitive deprecation info, so it does not warrant the level-4 trim.

5 / 5

Actionability

Every step is a copy-paste-ready command with exact flags ("messages --from claude --json", "save --session ID --messages 1,3", "--exclude PATH" repeatable, "submit <task folder> --json"), and the subcommands and flags were verified to exist in scripts/capture.py. Placeholders like <skill> and ID are data-dependent arguments, with the <skill> path convention explained up front.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Save → show summary → consent gate → submit → follow-up is clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints (secret detection: "stop and tell the user; do not work around it"; "Ask first, every time; say what will be uploaded") and a feedback loop mapping recoverable errors to actions ("not signed in" → login; day's limit → try later; task too large → re-save with --exclude). The one risky operation, uploading, is explicitly gated, so no cap applies.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Three well-labeled sections (Save, Submit, Follow it) match the three operations; the single bundle file scripts/capture.py is signaled up front and does the work, and nothing inlined belongs in a separate reference (the stage list and error catalogue are short and load-bearing). References are one level deep and verified against the actual bundle.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: concrete actions covering all of the skill's functionality, an explicit Use-when clause with quoted user phrasings (including a Chinese variant), and a distinctive niche with essentially no conflict risk. It is concise at ~75 words with no fluff or over-claims.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists four concrete actions covering the skill's full surface — "Save a finished Claude Code or Codex session as a Harbor task", "submit it to Env Hub", "check how a submitted task is going", "list their environments" — so it matches the comprehensive-coverage anchor rather than the minor-gaps level below, since no missing action can be named.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: the "what" (save a session as a Harbor task and submit it to Env Hub, which writes the verifier and reference solution) and an explicit "Use when..." clause with concrete trigger phrases — a structural match to the level-5 anchor example. Level 4 requires a less-explicit "when", which does not apply here.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes verbatim quoted trigger phrases users would naturally say ("save this session as a Harbor task", "turn this into a Harbor task or environment", "submit this to Env Hub", "保存为 Harbor 任务") plus follow-up triggers for status and listing, covering synonyms across two languages. Not score 4, because no natural term for this niche is identifiable as missing.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Triggers on unique product vocabulary ("Harbor task", "Env Hub") that no other skill would claim, giving it a clear niche with minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

eigent-ai/agent-skills

Path

skills/coding-agents-and-ides/env-hub/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.