Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Lean and highly actionable: the body delivers executable ES|QL commands for each investigation phase with no wasted tokens. The gaps are modest — no explicit validation/decision checkpoints between steps, and no reference files for extended query patterns.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body contains only one-line purpose statements and executable ES|QL commands with zero concept explanations or padding — e.g. 'Start with high-level health checks:' followed directly by commands — so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready `elastic es query` commands cover the common RCA cases (scope check via cluster health/SLOs, error-rate by service, timeline bucketing, deploy/restart/config changes, cross-service dependency stats, CPU and network metrics), with a symptom-to-cause table for interpretation. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five steps (assess scope, timeline reconstruction, correlation analysis, common root causes, resolution documentation) are clearly sequenced and the symptom table acts as a decision aid, but there are no explicit decision checkpoints linking each step's output to the next action or feedback loops on unexpected results. Read-only investigation means the destructive-operation validation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized file with clean sections and nothing inlined that clearly belongs in a separate bundle, but at ~70 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception and offers no one-level-deep references (e.g. an ES|QL query cookbook) for deeper material. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |