CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

slo-management

Use this skill when working with Elastic SLOs (Service Level Objectives). Activate when the user asks about SLO status, burn rates, error budgets, or needs to create and manage SLO definitions.

65

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./packages/opencode/src/elastic/skills/slo-management/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A concise, actionable reference for Elastic SLO management with executable commands and a clear status-interpretation table. Its main weakness is the absence of a sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints and a gap in covering SLO creation.

Suggestions

Add a concrete example or command for creating an SLO definition, since the description promises 'create and manage' capabilities.

Sequence the operations as an explicit workflow (e.g., list → interpret status → query rollups → act) with a validation checkpoint confirming the ES|QL query returned expected fields.

Move the Key Concepts definitions into a brief reference note or trim them, relying on Claude's existing knowledge of SLI/SLO/error-budget terms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with concrete commands and a compact status table; only the Key Concepts section mildly re-explains terms Claude already knows. Not a 5 because those definitions could be trimmed further.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste executable commands ('elastic slos list', 'elastic slos list-definitions', the ES|QL query) covering common cases. Not a 5 because it does not show how to create an SLO, which the description promises.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Content is organized by task with a useful status→action table, but there is no sequenced multi-step workflow or explicit validation checkpoint. Not a 4 because no validation steps or feedback loops are present.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Clear section headers and well-organized inline content appropriate for a compact single-domain skill with no bundle files. Not a 5 because there are no signaled references to deeper material and everything is inline.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-constructed description that clearly scopes the Elastic SLO domain with explicit 'Use when/Activate when' trigger guidance and concrete capability terms. It is specific, complete, and distinct with only minor synonym/coverage gaps.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the Elastic SLOs domain and several specific actions ('asks about SLO status, burn rates, error budgets, or needs to create and manage SLO definitions'), with only minor coverage gaps. Not a 5 because it does not enumerate a comprehensive set of SLO operations (e.g., alerting, deletion).

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states both what ('working with Elastic SLOs', 'create and manage SLO definitions') and when ('Activate when the user asks about SLO status, burn rates, error budgets...') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users say ('SLO status', 'burn rates', 'error budgets', 'create and manage SLO definitions') plus the acronym and full name. Not a 5 because some common variations/synonyms an SRE might use are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche (Elastic SLOs) with distinct triggers (burn rates, error budgets) and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
elastic/elastic-ramen
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.