Conciseness

Lean checklist bullets with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows and no padding; every section earns its place; not 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten.

Actionability

Provides a copy-paste output-format template, concrete per-category checklist items, and a severity guide — fully actionable instruction-only guidance; not 2 because there is no pseudocode or vague direction.

Workflow Clarity

A numbered 5-step Process is clearly sequenced with an explicit verification/stop checkpoint ('If you found nothing... stop. Don't manufacture issues'); not a destructive/batch op so no cap applies; not 2 because the checkpoint is explicit, not implicit.

Progressive Disclosure

Single-purpose skill with no bundle files, well-organized into clear navigable sections and no nested references; per the simple-skills note this scores 3; not 2 because content is appropriately inline with nothing that should be split out.

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — 'adversarial code review', 'find bugs', 'audit for correctness', 'stress-test a PR' — matching the anchor for listing multiple specific concrete actions; not 2 because it is comprehensive rather than domain-plus-some.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('hunts for them', 'assumes bugs exist') and when via an explicit 'Use when...' clause with concrete triggers; not 2 because the trigger guidance is explicit rather than implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms users would actually say — 'review code', 'find bugs', 'audit for correctness', 'stress-test a PR', 'tear this apart', 'what's wrong with this'; not 2 because common variations are well covered.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear adversarial niche with distinct triggers ('tear this apart', 'stress-test a PR') unlikely to fire for other skills; written in third person, so no voice penalty; not 2 because it does not meaningfully overlap with sibling skills.