Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-sequenced coordinator skill with concrete commands, explicit validation checkpoints, a result taxonomy, and clear cleanup guidance. The only soft spot is the deliberately underspecified tester-launch mechanism, which trades a bit of executable specificity for flexibility.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, well-sectioned body that assumes Claude's competence and explains no background concepts; every line gives actionable coordinator guidance or a concrete command. Matches the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands ('pnpm ux:site:start -- --target node --profile editorial-small', 'pnpm ux:site:stop -- <run-id>') and concrete file paths plus an enumerated taxonomy. Not 5 because the tester-launch mechanism is left as 'Use any agent implementation that provides browser control', an intentional but real gap in executable specificity. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear three-phase sequence (Prepare / Isolate / Verify-and-report) with explicit validation checkpoints: stop on 'needs-profile', run 'Coordinator checks' independently, wait for tester to give up, classify into a five-value taxonomy, and stop the run after evidence collection even on failure. Fits the anchor for explicit validation steps with feedback/classification for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines of content with no need for bundle files (none present) and clean section headers; the referenced acceptance/ paths are runtime repo locations, not nested bundle references. Matches the simple-skill exception where well-organized sections alone score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |