Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured single-purpose skill body with concrete examples and a clear validation checklist, and no padding. The only marginal gap is the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop, which the rubric notes is most critical for destructive/batch operations that this skill is not.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence—no preamble explaining what git or commits are—relying on compact tables, a short format template, and minimal examples, with every token earning its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides fully concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: explicit subject-line format, a type table with worked examples, and complete annotated example messages for the minimum, body, and footer cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced 'Validation Gates' checklist (subject, body/footer only if requested, final checks) gives an explicit workflow, but the validation is a static checklist rather than a true validate-fix-retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a sub-50-line single-purpose skill with no bundle files and no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |