Quick reference for all available Endor Labs commands. Use when the user says "endor help", "what commands are available", "endor usage", "what can endor do", or wants to discover available security scanning capabilities. Do NOT use when the user already knows which specific command they want — route to that skill directly.
93
91%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
89%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-structured description with excellent trigger terms and completeness, including both positive and negative routing guidance. Its main weakness is that the 'what' portion is somewhat generic — it says 'quick reference for all available commands' without listing any specific commands or categories. The negative trigger clause is a strong differentiator that reduces conflict risk with related skills.
Suggestions
Add 2-3 specific examples of the types of commands or categories covered (e.g., 'scanning, policy management, reporting') to improve specificity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | It names the domain ('Endor Labs commands') and describes the general action ('quick reference'), but does not list specific concrete actions or capabilities beyond 'security scanning capabilities'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (quick reference for all available Endor Labs commands) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with multiple trigger phrases, plus a 'Do NOT use when' clause for disambiguation). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes multiple natural trigger phrases users would actually say: 'endor help', 'what commands are available', 'endor usage', 'what can endor do', and 'discover available security scanning capabilities'. Also includes a helpful negative trigger to avoid conflicts. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The explicit 'Do NOT use when the user already knows which specific command they want — route to that skill directly' clause clearly distinguishes this as a discovery/help skill versus specific command skills, minimizing conflict risk. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted command reference skill that is concise, actionable, and clearly organized. Its main strength is the clean tabular format with logical groupings and practical examples. The only weakness is the lack of explicit cross-references to individual command skill files, which would improve navigation for users wanting to drill deeper.
Suggestions
Add explicit links to individual command skill files (e.g., 'See [endor-scan.md](endor-scan.md) for full usage') to improve progressive disclosure and navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient — it's a pure reference table with no unnecessary explanations of what security scanning is or how CLI tools work. Every token serves the purpose of command discovery. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste ready commands with clear descriptions. The 'Quick Examples' section shows exact usage patterns with arguments, making it immediately actionable for users. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For a reference/discovery skill, the workflow is simply 'present this to the user.' The commands are logically grouped by category (Getting Started → Scanning → Analysis → Findings → Compliance → Advanced), and the Tips section provides clear guidance on when to use which command. This is a single-task skill where the action is unambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear categorical sections, but it's entirely self-contained with no references to deeper documentation for individual commands. The final line mentions providing detailed usage for specific commands but doesn't point to where those details live (e.g., linking to individual skill files). | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
344e7ff
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.