Content
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a clean, well-organized command reference that serves its purpose as a discovery/help skill. Its main strength is conciseness and clear categorization. Its weaknesses are the lack of explicit workflow guidance for new users (e.g., recommended order of operations) and the absence of references to detailed per-command documentation, which limits progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add a brief 'Recommended Workflow' section showing the typical sequence: setup → scan → review findings → fix → pre-PR review, to improve workflow clarity.
Include explicit references or links to per-command skill files (e.g., 'For detailed usage, see [endor-scan.md](endor-scan.md)') to improve progressive disclosure.
Make the final instruction ('If the user asks about a specific command, provide detailed usage for that command only') more actionable by specifying where to find that detailed usage or what format to use.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient — it's essentially a well-formatted reference table with no unnecessary explanations. Every line serves a purpose: command name and brief description. No concepts are over-explained. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a clear command reference with examples, but the commands themselves are slash-commands whose behavior is defined elsewhere. The 'Quick Examples' section adds concrete usage patterns, but there's no executable code or detailed guidance on what each command actually does or returns. The final line ('provide detailed usage for that command only') is vague. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The commands are organized into logical categories (Getting Started → Scanning → Analysis → Findings → Compliance → Advanced), and the Tips section suggests a lightweight workflow (scan → review → fix). However, there's no explicit multi-step workflow with validation checkpoints — e.g., no guidance on 'run setup first, then scan, then review findings, then fix.' | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized into sections with tables, which is good structure. However, there are no references to detailed documentation files for individual commands. The skill mentions routing to specific command skills but doesn't provide any links or file references. With no bundle files, this is a missed opportunity for clear navigation to deeper content. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |