Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A focused, efficient instruction skill with clear sequencing, routing gates, and appropriate safety constraints. It could add an explicit validation/recovery checkpoint and slightly more concrete command guidance to reach full marks.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/recovery checkpoint (e.g., how to confirm the canonical policy was correctly applied) to strengthen the workflow feedback loop.
Specify one or two concrete commands or tool invocations for loading the canonical instruction files to make the guidance more copy-paste ready.
Consider folding the 'Typical requests' examples into the description's USE FOR list to reduce slight redundancy with the frontmatter.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, well-organized body with no concept padding and no over-explanation of PR review basics; nearly every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable routing to specific instruction files and classification gates; appropriate for an instruction-only skill, with minor gaps in specifying exact commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced instructions with a classification gate and explicit no-findings handling; lacks explicit validation/recovery checkpoints, but the skill is read-only so the destructive cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections under 50 lines with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references to canonical instruction files; no bundle files exist, and the simple-skill exception supports a high score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |