Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured TDD process with strong workflow sequencing, validation checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure into real reference files. Conciseness and a missing executable code example keep it from maximum.
Suggestions
Trim the philosophical opening paragraph ('TDD is a design technique...') to keep only the process-relevant guidance and improve token efficiency.
Add one short executable test snippet (e.g., a failing test plus minimal passing code) to make the implementation phase copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basics, but the philosophical opening framing and a few non-action lines could be trimmed; falls just short of the 'every token earns its place' anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable numbered process with a concrete [TEST] comment format and given-when-then guidance, but as an instruction-only skill it lacks a copy-paste executable code example, leaving minor gaps versus anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced phases (planning, implementation, final evaluation) with explicit validation checkpoints (predict failure, run tests, see red/green) and feedback loops for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to boundary-testing.md and zombies.md, both of which exist and match their described contents. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |