Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable body with a clear multi-step workflow, concrete output schema, and built-in validation via scoring rounds and quality gates. The main gaps are a missing prompt template for the panel-scoring call, placeholder output-writing commands, and some repeated guidance.
Suggestions
Provide a concrete prompt template for the 5-expert panel batch-scoring call (the persona lenses are defined, but the actual scoring prompt structure is only described, not shown).
Replace the placeholder '# Write optimized content / experiments JSON / optimization report' comments with concrete write commands or a small script, so Step 5 is copy-paste ready.
State the batch-once API rule once in the Step 3 execution protocol and remove the duplicate restatements in the panel, round-structure, and anti-patterns sections to tighten token use.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's intelligence (no preamble on what A/B testing or landing pages are), but the batch-rule ('Never call the API once per variant') is restated 3-4 times across the panel, round-structure, step-3, and anti-patterns sections — minor over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: full experiments JSON schema, named models, $ANTHROPIC_API_KEY env var, and a clear step sequence. Minor gaps: the core panel-scoring API call is described ('Batch-score all 10 with the 5-expert panel') rather than given as a prompt template, and the output step uses placeholder comments ('# Write optimized content'). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-6 are clearly sequenced with a defined round structure, explicit stop condition, and a round-3 feedback loop targeting the weakest dimension; quality gates act as a checklist. Validation (scoring/ranking) is built into the batch operation, so the batch-cap does not apply, though the validate->fix->retry loop is implicit rather than explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references; content (per-type score dimensions, JSON schema) is reasonably kept inline. No bundle files exist, and the only referenced file (references/founder-voice.md) is described as user-created rather than a provided reference, so structure is scored on the in-file organization, which is good with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |