Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a well-sequenced workflow and proper confirmation guardrails for saving keywords. The main weakness is minor redundancy of the Search Console procedure across two sections.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the Search Console striking-distance instructions: keep the parameter detail in the tools section and reference it briefly from workflow step 1.
Consider moving the per-tool usage notes into a references file if the tool list grows, to preserve the lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and well-structured, but the Search Console striking-distance procedure (high rowLimit, filter positions 5-20, hydrate with get_keyword_metrics) is restated nearly verbatim in both the tools list and workflow step 1, which could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance: named MCP tools with specific parameters (150 results, up to 700 keywords, rowLimit, position 5-20) and concrete tag formats like 'topic:<topic>'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 10-step workflow with an explicit validation checkpoint for the destructive/batch operation — 'Ask before saving keywords' — plus guardrails reinforcing it. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file, no-bundle skill organized into clear sections (Goal, Required inputs, Tools, Workflow, Output format, Guardrails); with no external references needed, well-organized sections satisfy the anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |