CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

review-brief

Produce a scannable review brief for a branch or PR so the maintainer can approve without reading the whole diff. Use when the user asks "how do I review this", "summarize the changes", "what should I look at", or wants to understand a PR in under two minutes.

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, highly actionable instruction skill with a well-sequenced workflow, explicit validation, and a built-in review feedback loop. The sole gap is the absence of a fully assembled example brief illustrating the template end-to-end.

Suggestions

Include one short worked example of a completed brief (filled layout) so the output format is unambiguous and copy-paste-ready.

Optionally split the Layout section into a reference file if the skill grows, keeping SKILL.md as a scannable overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense, imperative, and free of concept re-explanation; every section (Process, Crucial code criteria, Layout, Rules, Anti-patterns) carries task-specific guidance that earns its tokens.

5 / 5

Actionability

It gives concrete commands (git log/diff invocations) and a precise layout template, but stops short of a fully assembled worked example of a finished brief, leaving a minor gap versus copy-paste-ready guidance.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear five-step sequence includes explicit validation ('Every line number cited must be verified against the working tree') and a feedback loop (step 5: second-agent review -> fix real bugs -> report), matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained file with no need for external references is organized into well-labeled sections (Process, Crucial code criteria, Layout, Rules, Anti-patterns), making navigation easy.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description with explicit 'what' and 'when' anchored by natural quoted trigger phrases. Its only weakness is specificity: it names a single action rather than enumerating several concrete capabilities.

Suggestions

List 2-3 concrete actions the brief performs (e.g. 'classify hunks by risk, excerpt crucial code, verify cited line numbers') to lift specificity toward the top anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain ('review brief for a branch or PR') and one concrete action ('Produce a scannable review brief'), but does not enumerate several specific actions like the score-4 anchor requires.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly states both what it does ('Produce a scannable review brief... so the maintainer can approve without reading the whole diff') and when to use it via concrete 'Use when...' trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Four quoted natural utterances ('how do I review this', 'summarize the changes', 'what should I look at', 'understand a PR in under two minutes') plus synonyms (review/summarize/look at) give comprehensive coverage of phrases a user would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (a maintainer-approval brief consumed in under two minutes) with distinct triggers is clearly separable from general code-review or summarization skills, giving minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

every-app/open-seo

Path

.agents/skills/review-brief/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.