Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable coaching guide that supplies genuinely product-specific knowledge and concrete tool/workflow names with clear workflows; it is held back only by minor redundancy and implicit rather than explicit validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — it provides product-specific knowledge (OpenSEO MCP vs GSC vs web search vs scraping) that Claude would not already know — with only minor redundancy between the "First response" example and the "Suggested next actions" list that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only coaching skill it gives concrete, executable guidance: named tool calls (get_project_context, update_project_context, get_search_console_performance), named workflows, numbered coaching patterns, and a copy-ready example first response, with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The "Project context" section is a clearly sequenced 4-step workflow with a checkpoint (check the research log before spending credits; write back durable info on finish) and the coaching patterns give ordered steps; this is not a destructive/batch skill so the cap does not apply, though validation is implicit rather than fully explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized with clear section headers, no bundle files are needed, and navigation is easy; minor organization gaps (some overlap between the example response and the suggested-action list) keep it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |