Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably lean and appropriately sized for a simple skill, anchored by one concrete command. Its weakness is under-specification: the follow-up steps tell Claude what to determine but not how, leaving the actual code-assignment procedure undocumented.
Suggestions
Expand step 2 with the concrete procedure: what the `yarn extract-errors` output looks like and the exact edit that assigns a new code (file path and code format)
Clarify whether step 3 is a separate command or a check of the script output, and what 'up to date' means operationally
Add a brief validation checkpoint, e.g., re-run `yarn extract-errors` after assigning codes to confirm no uncoded errors remain
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is 13 lines with zero padding: a title, one section header, and three terse steps. Every token earns its place and nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Step 1 is a concrete executable command ('Run `yarn extract-errors`'), but steps 2-3 ('Report if any new errors need codes assigned', 'Check if error codes are up to date') give no method — nothing about how to read the script output, where codes are stored, or how to assign a new code. Concrete guidance exists but key details are missing, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A three-step sequence is present, but steps 2 and 3 are ambiguous (is 'Check if error codes are up to date' a separate action or interpreting the script output?) and there is no validation checkpoint. It sits above anchor 2 (a real sequence with a specific command exists) but below anchor 4 (steps are not clearly defined and lack checkpoints). | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, and it is cleanly sectioned ('# Extract Error Codes' / '## Instructions'). Per the rubric guideline for simple skills, well-organized sections alone merit a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |