Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably concise and well-structured for a simple skill, but the later workflow steps are vague and lack the validation checkpoint a batch error-extraction operation warrants. Conciseness and progressive disclosure are strong; actionability and workflow clarity lag.
Suggestions
Make step 2 actionable, e.g. 'Review the script output for lines listing uncoded messages and assign the next available code in errors.json.'
Add an explicit verification checkpoint after running the script, such as 'Re-run `yarn extract-errors`; if it reports no new codes, the codes are up to date.'
Specify where error codes live (e.g., the file/path the script reads and writes) so Claude can act without guessing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The three-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Step 1 gives a concrete executable command (`yarn extract-errors`), but steps 2 ('Report if any new errors need codes assigned') and 3 ('Check if error codes are up to date') are high-level hints missing the specific mechanism for reporting or checking. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are listed in a clear sequence, but `yarn extract-errors` is a batch scan operation with no validation/verification checkpoint describing how to confirm codes are current, capping clarity at 3 per the batch-operation guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references; the single well-organized section meets the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |