Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean, high-signal skill writing: a tightly sequenced conformance loop with explicit verification, adjudication persistence, and a net-improvement feedback gate, plus project-specific rationale that Claude could not infer. The only meaningful gap is that a few artifacts (adjudications.json record shape, the 'review' step) are underspecified for a reader new to the project.
Suggestions
Add a minimal example of one adjudications.json record (tool, finding, verdict, source-of-truth reference) so step 5 is copy-paste executable rather than inferable.
Briefly gloss 'Run `review`' (e.g. which command or CI lane it refers to) so the final step is actionable outside the project's original context.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line carries non-obvious, project-specific rationale (why bare tool runs differ from CI runs, why unadjudicated verdicts get re-reported forever) with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. The closing one-liner 'Competitor output is a lead, not ground truth' is load-bearing, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance dominates: run comparison tools 'as the project's CI or `package.json` script runs it, with the same flags and preprocessors', record in '`tests/conformance/adjudications.json`', 'retain only net improvements', and the command 'Run `review`'. It falls short of 5 because the adjudication record format, the classification method, and what 'review' invokes are left unspecified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step sequence has an explicit verification checkpoint (step 3), a classification gate (step 4), a record-before-fix ordering (step 5), and a closed feedback loop (step 7: re-run the full corpus and retain only net improvements before the final review). This matches the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation steps and feedback loops; the only opacity ('Run `review`') is too minor to drop to 4. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist) and no nested references; the only file path mentioned (tests/conformance/adjudications.json) is a project output, not a navigation target. Per the rubric's simple-skill note, a short self-contained skill with well-organized content scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |