Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-sequenced instruction-only workflow with concrete artifacts and built-in validation gates. Minor abstractness in two steps and a missing explicit regression-failure feedback loop are the only weak spots.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, terse steps that assume Claude's competence, with one minor instance of over-explanation in step 5's rationale clause that could be trimmed; not perfectly token-efficient as anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Names a concrete artifact path, a real command ('Run review'), and a defined classification taxonomy, with minor gaps where tool-run settings and 'one general correction' stay abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 8-step sequence with validation checkpoints (regression fixture, re-run-and-retain-only-net-improvements, review), but lacks an explicit error-recovery feedback loop and checklist, stopping short of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, self-contained skill under 50 lines with no need for external references; the single well-ordered numbered list is well-organized, qualifying for 5 under the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |