Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exceptionally lean, well-sequenced iterative loop with an explicit validation gate and feedback loop; the only gaps are unspecified measurement commands and implicit error-recovery detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Eight lines with zero padding or over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Names concrete commands (`sig-audit`, `review`) and a clear keep/discard procedure, but the measurement step leaves the exact command unspecified and 'implement' is abstract, fitting 'mostly executable guidance; minor gaps'; not a 5 due to no copy-paste examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 1-6 sequence with an explicit validation gate (step 4) and a repeat loop (step 5); not a 5 because discard-on-failure recovery is implicit rather than spelled out as fix->revalidate and there is no checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, and well-organized with a heading plus numbered list, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |