CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

sweep

Audit the current Fallow session for missed work, incomplete verification, stale documentation, companion drift, or cleanup before final completion.

62

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/sweep/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is an exceptionally lean, well-structured sweep checklist with clear sequencing and strong validation emphasis; its only weakness is that some steps are high-level directives whose exact execution mechanism is left implicit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is a lean ~10-line checklist with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place and it fully assumes Claude's competence.

5 / 5

Actionability

Steps give concrete, specific targets ('missed consumers, output formats, filters, docs, skills, schemas, CI scripts, companion repositories, and private/public boundaries'), but a few directives like 'Map every acceptance criterion to authoritative evidence' leave the mechanism implicit, so it is mostly rather than fully executable.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered 1-6 sequence with validation checkpoints (step 4 'Re-run any weak or stale verification' and the closing 'Prove every requested outcome'), but the fix -> re-verify feedback loop is implicit rather than explicitly sequenced.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines, single-purpose, and no external references are needed; the numbered list plus closing emphasis is well-organized, so progressive disclosure scores 5 per the simple-skill exception.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys what the skill audits and is reasonably specific and distinct, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause and leans on some domain-specific jargon, leaving trigger guidance only weakly implied.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause (e.g., 'Use when finishing a Fallow session or before declaring a task complete') to satisfy the 'when' half of completeness.

Soften or annotate product-specific jargon like 'companion drift' and 'Fallow session' with natural synonyms a user would actually say.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('Audit the current Fallow session') and lists several concrete audit targets — 'missed work, incomplete verification, stale documentation, companion drift, or cleanup' — giving comprehensive coverage beyond 1-2 actions, though the single verb 'audit' keeps it just short of fully comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (audit the session for the listed categories), but 'when' is only weakly implied by 'before final completion' with no explicit 'Use when...' clause, capping completeness at 3 per the rubric guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords like 'audit', 'missed work', 'cleanup', and 'verification' are partly natural, but terms such as 'companion drift' and 'Fallow session' are product-specific jargon and common synonyms/variations are missing.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Fallow session' scoping carves a clear niche for a pre-completion audit, with only minor overlap risk against general review/verification skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
fallow-rs/fallow
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.