CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

grill-me

针对方案或设计的高强度追问式面试(adversarial design review / grill session),暴露假设漏洞与缺失约束,过程中同步维护领域模型(术语表和 ADR)。手动调用 /grill-me。

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/grill-me/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured, lean, and actionable with concrete templates and explicit behavioral checkpoints, scoring consistently strong across all dimensions with only minor gaps.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean, directive prose with purposeful templates and ASCII tree diagrams that earn their place; only minor explanatory sentences could be trimmed without loss.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready CONTEXT.md and ADR templates, an explicit three-criteria ADR gate, and specific behavioral rules; minor gaps such as no example grill dialogue keep it from fully executable.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear 3-step startup sequence and explicit checkpoints ('在我明确确认达成共识之前,不要开始执行方案') with feedback loops for contradictions; the ongoing grilling loop is less rigidly sequenced than a linear workflow.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized inline sections with clear headers and appropriately inlined format references; no bundle files exist, and the ~200-line body is longer than the simple-skill exception that would score 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a distinctive, multi-part capability with concrete actions, but lacks an explicit trigger ('Use when…') clause and natural synonym coverage, leaving the 'when to use it' under-specified.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural trigger phrases (e.g., 'Use when you want to stress-test a design, challenge assumptions, or pressure-test a proposal before implementation').

Include common synonyms users might say (e.g., '挑战方案', '审查设计', 'design review', 'stress-test') to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Reframe '暴露假设漏洞与缺失约束' slightly toward a concrete action verb to push specificity from outcome toward operation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions — adversarial review, exposing assumption holes, and maintaining a glossary plus ADR — though the actions tilt toward outcomes rather than fully enumerated operations.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does, but the 'when' is only weakly implied via '手动调用 /grill-me' (how to invoke rather than when to use it); no explicit 'Use when…' clause caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant terms like '追问', 'grill session', '方案/设计', but misses common natural variations or synonyms a user might say when needing this skill.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Has a clear niche (adversarial design review paired with live domain modeling) with minimal overlap; only minor risk of confusion with general code-review skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 3 missing, 3 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
feiskyer/claude-code-settings
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.