CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ai-integration-architect

Skill para desenhar e implementar integracoes de IA em aplicacoes, separando provider, adapter, hooks, observabilidade, custo e seguranca. Use quando o usuario quiser adicionar texto, imagem ou video ao app. Trigger em: "integrar IA no app", "AI integration", "provider adapter de IA", "feature de IA", "chamar OpenAI", "chamar Anthropic", "Claude API", "LLM no app", "arquitetura de IA", "custo de IA", "fallback de provider", "rate limit de IA".

52

Quality

56%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/25-ai-integration-architect/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

22%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill functions primarily as a routing document that points to external pattern files and policies without providing any concrete, actionable guidance itself. It lacks executable code examples, specific architectural patterns, workflow steps, or validation checkpoints. While the organizational intent is reasonable, the skill body alone gives Claude almost nothing to act on beyond 'go read these other files.'

Suggestions

Add at least one concrete, executable example of a provider adapter pattern (e.g., a TypeScript/Python adapter interface with a real implementation for OpenAI or Anthropic) so the skill has standalone actionable value.

Define a clear numbered workflow for AI integration: e.g., 1) Identify use case type, 2) Select provider, 3) Implement adapter, 4) Add hooks, 5) Configure cost controls, 6) Validate with test call — with explicit validation checkpoints.

Include a minimal decision tree or table for provider selection (e.g., text→Anthropic/OpenAI, image→DALL-E/Midjourney, video→Runway) so Claude has concrete guidance without needing to consult external files.

Remove or consolidate the boilerplate sections (Entradas/Saidas Esperadas, Evidencia de Conclusao) into a more compact format, and use the saved space for actual implementation guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is moderately efficient but includes several sections that are somewhat boilerplate (Governanca Global listing many policy files, Quando Usar/Nao Usar, Entradas/Saidas Esperadas) without adding much actionable value. The submodule section at the end is useful but could be tighter.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides no concrete code, no executable examples, no specific API calls, no adapter patterns, and no hook implementations. It entirely delegates to external pattern files (patterns/ai-integration/*) without showing any actual guidance. It describes what to do at a meta level ('consultar providers.md', 'adapters e hooks mapeados') but never shows how.

1 / 3

Workflow Clarity

There is no clear sequenced workflow for implementing an AI integration. The skill lists inputs, outputs, and references but never defines a step-by-step process with validation checkpoints. For a multi-step architectural task involving provider selection, adapter implementation, cost analysis, and security review, the absence of any workflow sequence is a significant gap.

1 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill references multiple external files (patterns/ai-integration/*, policies/*, templates/*) which shows intent for progressive disclosure, but since no bundle files are provided, we cannot verify these references exist. The structure has clear sections and one-level-deep references, but the main content is essentially just a pointer to other files with almost no standalone value.

2 / 3

Total

6

/

12

Passed

Description

89%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a well-structured skill description with strong trigger term coverage in both Portuguese and English, and explicit 'when to use' guidance. The main weakness is that the capability description could be more specific about concrete actions/deliverables rather than listing architectural concerns at a high level. The 'Use quando' clause mentioning 'adicionar texto, imagem ou video ao app' feels slightly disconnected from the more specific trigger terms about AI architecture.

Suggestions

Replace the vague 'desenhar e implementar integracoes de IA' with more specific actions like 'creates provider abstraction layers, implements fallback logic between AI providers, adds rate limiting and cost tracking'.

Align the 'Use quando' clause with the trigger terms — currently it says 'adicionar texto, imagem ou video ao app' which is generic and doesn't match the architectural focus of the triggers.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain (AI integrations in applications) and lists architectural concerns like provider, adapter, hooks, observability, cost, and security. However, the concrete actions are somewhat vague — 'desenhar e implementar integracoes' is broad, and it doesn't list specific deliverables like 'create provider abstraction layer' or 'implement fallback logic'.

2 / 3

Completeness

The description clearly answers both 'what' (design and implement AI integrations covering provider, adapter, hooks, observability, cost, security) and 'when' (explicit 'Use quando' clause plus a detailed 'Trigger em' list with specific phrases). Both components are explicitly stated.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms in both Portuguese and English, including specific phrases users would say like 'chamar OpenAI', 'Claude API', 'LLM no app', 'fallback de provider', 'rate limit de IA', and 'AI integration'. These cover many realistic user phrasings.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The skill has a clear niche — AI provider integration architecture in applications — with very specific trigger terms like 'provider adapter de IA', 'fallback de provider', and 'rate limit de IA' that are unlikely to conflict with general coding skills or other AI-related skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
felvieira/claude-skills-fv
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.