Conciseness

Almost all content is skill-specific and load-bearing (verbatim dialogue, branch tables, glossary mappings — nothing explains concepts Claude already knows), but the same rules are restated in 'Regras rígidas', 'Regras de Voz', and 'Anti-Padroes' (e.g. 'Sem "Ótima pergunta!"' and 'nunca perguntar em formato de schema' each appear in all three), and the four output files are listed three times ('Saidas Esperadas', Estágio 10, 'Anatomia da Saída'). Matches anchor 3 ('could be tightened'); not 2 because the padding is duplication of real rules rather than generic filler, not 4 because the redundancy is more than minor instances.

Actionability

Highly executable for an instruction-only skill: copy-paste bash commands ('python3 scripts/audit_pasta_existente.py', 'renderizar_mapa.py --input ... --output ...'), ~15 verbatim dialogue blocks, a full JSON skeleton for mapa_dados.json, and explicit three-way branch tables. Falls short of anchor 5 only on the two text deliverables: prompt_handoff.txt has no template (only 'pré-preenchido com o mapa completo') and OPORTUNIDADES.md gets grouping order but no format example. Not 3 because nothing is pseudocode or vague.

Workflow Clarity

Stages 0-10 (with 6.5/6.6/6.7/9.5) are clearly sequenced, each with explicit inputs and branching (greenfield vs auditoria-existente, three Estágio 9.5 responses with distinct routings), plus confirm-edit feedback loops (Estágios 2 and 6.5: 'Sim: confirmar / Não: pular / Ajustar: perguntar') and a completion checklist ('Evidencia de Conclusao' including 'mapa_dados.html gerado e abre sem erro'). The skill is read-only plus writes to its own output folder, so the destructive/batch cap does not apply; matches anchor 5 (explicit validation, feedback loops, checklist).

Progressive Disclosure

All 9 bundle files exist and each is referenced at its point of use with a stated purpose ('Abrir references/recipe_templates.md e puxar as 4-7 receitas de partida'; 'Consultar references/tool_defaults.md ... usar esses valores em silêncio'), one level deep — question chains, tool-default tables, templates, and engineering tips are offloaded while the interview protocol itself stays in SKILL.md. Spot-checks confirm the referenced files are real and substantive. Matches anchor 5 (well-signaled one-level-deep references, appropriate split); the inline archetype summary duplicating arquetipos.md is a table-of-contents pattern, not a nesting violation.

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Conduz discovery de negocio') and 1-2 actions ('converte respostas em requisitos'), but 'conduz discovery' is near-circular with the domain itself and the actual deliverables (mapa_dados.html, OPORTUNIDADES.md, prompt_handoff.txt) are never mentioned. This matches anchor 3 (domain plus 1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive); not 4 because coverage gaps are major rather than minor, not 2 because a second concrete action is explicitly stated.

Completeness

Both parts are present: a 'what' ('Conduz discovery de negocio e converte respostas em requisitos') and a fully explicit 'when' ('Trigger em:' followed by 11 concrete trigger phrases). Falls between anchors 4 and 5: the 'when' exceeds anchor 4's standard, but the 'what' is high-level, omits the deliverables, and says 'requisitos' where the body itself states the output is 'um mapa e uma lista de oportunidades' — so anchor 5's 'clearly and explicitly answers both' is not fully met.

Trigger Term Quality

Eleven natural first-person phrases a Portuguese business owner would actually say, with synonym-level variation ('o que eu deveria automatizar primeiro' / 'por onde eu começo a automatizar'; 'mapear minhas ferramentas' / 'mapa de dados do meu negócio'). Matches anchor 5's comprehensive natural-term coverage; anchor 4's 'a few natural terms missing' fits less well given the breadth and repetition of core intents.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Niche-specific triggers like 'dono de negócio sem programador' and 'pantry prep plate' carve a clear niche, but 'entrevista com o dono' and 'auditoria de ferramentas' carry minor overlap risk with sibling skills the body itself names (51-ux-research interviews, 18-repo-auditor audits), and the description carries no boundary statement. Matches anchor 4 (mostly distinct, minor overlap with closely related skills); not 5 for that unstated boundary.