Conciseness

Dense operational content with no tutorial padding — it assumes competence and skips explaining what canary deployment or a service mesh is. Not 5: minor over-explanation could be trimmed, e.g. the definitional line "Dois ambientes identicos: blue (atual em producao) e green (nova versao)" and some prose in 'Integracao com Pipeline'; not 3 because these are isolated instances in an otherwise efficient runbook.

Actionability

Concrete guidance throughout: a step ladder with exact percentages and soak times ("Step 2: 10% — soak 30 min"), quantified thresholds ("canary <= stable * 1.20"), and a near-executable AWS ALB command; the pseudocode is explicitly justified ("Pseudocodigo agnostico de stack", stack-flexibility policy). Not 5: placeholders ("...stable...", "TargetGroupArn":"...") and referenced-but-nonexistent files (canary-1pct.yaml) mean nothing is copy-paste ready.

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence (Step 0→100%) with per-step observation, pre-flight gates ("se baseline nao existe ou error budget esta esgotado, nao iniciar canary"), four explicit rollback triggers with sample persistence (N >= 2), a genuine error-recovery feedback loop ("se nao confirmar dentro da janela, escalar pra on-call humano imediatamente, nao repetir o comando de reversao"), and a completion checklist ('Evidencia de Conclusao'). This is the top anchor's profile: explicit validation, feedback loops, and checklists for a risky production operation.

Progressive Disclosure

Good internal section structure with clearly signaled references, but it is a ~230-line monolith with zero bundle files, and the referenced paths (GLOBAL.md, policies/execution.md, policies/handoffs.md, memory/constitution.md) do not resolve anywhere in the skill bundle. Not 2: sections are well organized and references are explicit, not buried; not 4: no content is split into separate files and the referenced files cannot be verified to exist.

Specificity

Lists several concrete capabilities — "Planeja rollout gradual, observacao e rollback de releases" names plan, monitor, and revert actions — matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps' anchor. Not 5: the single verb 'Planeja' keeps actions at a higher level than the top anchor's granular multi-verb list, and body-level capabilities (threshold tuning, postmortem, communication) are absent.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both parts: a clear what ("Planeja rollout gradual, observacao e rollback de releases") and an explicit when-equivalent clause ("Trigger em: 'canary', 'canary deployment', ...") with concrete trigger phrases. Not 4: the when-clause is fully explicit with concrete phrases rather than vague or implicit, matching the top anchor.

Trigger Term Quality

Nine natural trigger terms with good synonym coverage ("rollout gradual", "gradual release", "progressive deployment", "feature flag rollout", "blue-green") that users would plausibly say. Not 5: common variants like "canary release" and "traffic shifting"/"percentage rollout" are missing; not 3 because coverage clearly exceeds 'some relevant keywords'.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (gradual rollout strategy) with distinct triggers like "canary", "blue-green", and "feature flag rollout". Not 5: the generic "deploy seguro" trigger creates minor overlap risk with the sibling deploy/release-manager skills the body references; not 3 because the core triggers are tightly specific to rollout strategy rather than broadly overlapping.