Content
35%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill reads more like a process description or role definition than an actionable skill for Claude. It clearly delineates scope and responsibilities but lacks concrete examples, executable commands, specific file templates, or validation steps that would make it truly actionable. The content is moderately well-organized but could be significantly tightened and made more concrete.
Suggestions
Add concrete examples of task list format, handoff output, and persistence file content (e.g., show what docs/context/current-focus.md should look like with sample content)
Replace the abstract task lifecycle arrow with a numbered workflow including explicit validation steps (e.g., verify task count < 15, confirm no duplicate in_progress items)
Provide a concrete example of a focus-change scenario showing before/after state, including the exact resumo format to persist
Remove or drastically shorten the 'Skills Utilitárias' section — the external reference and explanation of fork context is tangential and adds token cost without clear actionable guidance
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is moderately efficient but includes several sections that are somewhat redundant or overly descriptive for Claude (e.g., 'Quando Usar/Nao Usar' lists, 'Entradas Esperadas/Saidas Esperadas' that largely restate obvious context). The 'Skills Utilitárias' section with the external reference and explanation of fork context adds bulk without clear actionable value. Some tightening is possible. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill is almost entirely descriptive and procedural in the abstract — it describes responsibilities, rules, and lifecycle stages but provides no concrete commands, executable code, specific file formats, or copy-paste examples. The task lifecycle is a vague arrow diagram, not an executable workflow. There are no concrete examples of what a task list, handoff, or persistence file should look like. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a recognizable lifecycle (pending → in_progress → completed) and a focus-change procedure with steps, but validation checkpoints are missing. There's no explicit verification step after creating/updating tasks, no error recovery if persistence fails, and the 'Ciclo de Vida' is a single-line arrow rather than a sequenced workflow with checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references multiple external policies (execution.md, persistence.md, etc.) and templates, which is good structure. However, no bundle files are provided, so we can't verify these references resolve. The content itself is somewhat monolithic — the 'Skills Utilitárias' section and governance references could be better signaled. The file paths like 'docs/context/current-focus.md' are mentioned but not linked or described. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |