Skill para migracoes, modernizacao de legacy e refactors estruturais. Use quando precisar fazer upgrades grandes, extracao incremental, strangler pattern, compatibilidade de transicao e rollout seguro.
55
44%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/23-migration-refactor-specialist/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description has a clear structure with both 'what' and 'when' clauses, which is its strongest aspect. However, it stays at a conceptual level without listing concrete actions the skill performs, and the trigger terms, while relevant, could be more comprehensive with specific technology names and common user phrasings. The Portuguese language may also limit discoverability for non-Portuguese users.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions the skill performs, e.g., 'Creates adapter layers, generates migration scripts, builds feature flags for incremental rollout'
Expand trigger terms with more natural variations users might say, such as 'upgrade framework version', 'replace legacy module', 'backward compatibility', 'phased migration', 'deprecate old system'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (migrations, legacy modernization, structural refactors) and mentions some patterns (strangler pattern, incremental extraction), but doesn't list concrete actions like 'extract module X', 'create adapter layers', or 'generate migration scripts'. The terms are more conceptual than actionable. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Explicitly answers both 'what' (migrations, legacy modernization, structural refactors) and 'when' with a clear 'Use quando precisar fazer...' clause listing specific trigger scenarios like upgrades, incremental extraction, strangler pattern, transition compatibility, and safe rollout. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant keywords like 'migracoes', 'legacy', 'refactors', 'strangler pattern', 'upgrades grandes', and 'rollout seguro'. However, it misses common natural variations users might say such as 'migrate database', 'upgrade framework', 'deprecate old code', 'backward compatibility', or specific technology terms. The Portuguese language also limits trigger matching for English-speaking users. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Terms like 'refactors estruturais' and 'modernizacao de legacy' carve out a reasonable niche, but 'refactors' could overlap with general code refactoring skills, and 'upgrades grandes' is broad enough to conflict with dependency update or version upgrade skills. The strangler pattern mention adds some distinctiveness. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
22%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill reads more like a role description or process checklist than actionable guidance for performing migrations. It lacks any concrete techniques, code examples, or step-by-step workflows for strangler pattern implementation, incremental extraction, compatibility layers, or rollback procedures. The content is almost entirely abstract, telling Claude what outcomes to produce without showing how to achieve them.
Suggestions
Add a concrete, sequenced workflow for a typical migration (e.g., 1. Audit current state → 2. Define compatibility layer → 3. Implement strangler pattern → 4. Validate phase → 5. Cut over) with explicit validation checkpoints at each phase.
Include at least one concrete example of a migration pattern (e.g., strangler fig with code showing how to route between old and new implementations, or a database migration with rollback SQL).
Replace or supplement the abstract checklists with executable guidance—specific commands, file templates, or decision trees that Claude can directly apply rather than interpret.
Consolidate the overlapping sections (Saidas Esperadas, Checklist Base, Evidencia de Conclusao) which all mention similar items like rollback criteria and phase tracking.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is relatively brief but contains redundancy between sections (e.g., 'Saidas Esperadas', 'Checklist Base', and 'Evidencia de Conclusao' overlap significantly with repeated mentions of rollback, phases, and risks). Some sections like 'Quando Usar/Nao Usar' are efficient, but overall it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides no concrete commands, code examples, executable steps, or specific techniques. It describes what should happen at an abstract level ('plano incremental', 'estrategia de compatibilidade temporaria') without showing how to actually do any of it. There are no strangler pattern examples, no migration script templates, no concrete rollback procedures. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no sequenced workflow for performing a migration. The checklist and outputs are stated as bullet points of desired outcomes, not as ordered steps with validation checkpoints. For a skill dealing with high-risk, multi-step migration operations, the absence of a clear phased workflow with explicit validation gates is a significant gap. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references external policies and a migration plan template, which is good progressive disclosure structure. However, the references are numerous and not clearly signaled with descriptions of what each contains. The main content itself lacks substance to serve as a useful overview, making the references feel like the skill is deferring all real content elsewhere. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
d87ad31
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.