Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a highly actionable PO specification guide with concrete formulas, thresholds, worked good/bad examples, and explicit validation checkpoints. Its main weaknesses are verbosity in the book-derived discovery/monetization section and a scrambled section order that puts pre-spec activities (ambiguity scoring, discovery) after the handoff instructions.
Suggestions
Move the textbook explanations in Fundamento de Negócio (Maslow distinction, Steve Blank maxim, freemium/LTV primers) to docs/skill-guides/po-feature-spec.md and keep only the actionable artifacts inline: the conversion thresholds (20%/10%/150 e-mails), the AARRR table, and the LTV > CAC guardrail.
Reorder sections to reflect execution order — ambiguity scoring, deep interview, and discovery validation all say 'antes de iniciar a spec'/'antes de especificar' yet appear after the Handoff section; or add a short numbered process overview at the top.
Trim the Governanca Global reference list by consolidating the eight policy file mentions into a single line with one-line purpose each, reducing token cost without losing navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly dense operational guidance, but sections like "problema = obstáculo que pede resolução; necessidade = algo subjetivo/fundamental (autoestima, conexão, expressão — Pirâmide de Maslow)", the Steve Blank maxim, and the freemium/LTV primers re-explain product-management concepts Claude already knows. This matches 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than anchor 2, since the padding is confined to the Fundamento de Negócio section. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully concrete for an instruction-only skill: the exact formula "Score = (Impacto × Urgência) / Esforço" with complete value tables and cut-lines, "ambiguity = 1 - (goal * 0.40 + constraints * 0.30 + criteria * 0.30)" with thresholds, a copy-paste enrich-mode dialog template, and good/bad examples for acceptance criteria ("DADO... QUANDO... ENTÃO") and vertical vs. layered slices. Specific examples cover the common cases, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Explicit validation checkpoints are present ("Checkpoint antes do handoff", "Checkpoint antes de fechar a spec", the readiness gate, and the Evidencia de Conclusao checklist) with per-section timing cues ("Antes de iniciar a spec", "antes de passar a spec para UI/UX"), matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. It falls short of 5 because the end-to-end order must be inferred: pre-spec activities (Ambiguity Scoring, Deep Interview, Fundamento de Negócio) appear near the end of the document, after the Handoff section. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Long examples and full checklists are deferred with clear purpose signals ("consultar `docs/skill-guides/po-feature-spec.md` apenas quando necessario") and references are one level deep, matching 'good structure; most content appropriately placed; references mostly clear'. Gaps: the ~60-line book-derived Fundamento de Negócio section is inlined when it belongs in the guide file, and no bundle files exist to verify the referenced paths (policies/, templates/, docs/), leaving minor organization uncertainty. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |