CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

po-feature-spec

Skill do Product Owner para especificação de features. Use quando precisar definir requisitos de negócio, escrever user stories, critérios de aceitação, priorização de backlog, ou qualquer documento de especificação de produto. Trigger em: "nova feature", "especificação", "user story", "requisito", "backlog", "PO", "definir escopo", "critério de aceitação", "MVP", "roadmap".

79

Quality

73%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/01-po-feature-spec/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

89%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a well-structured skill description with excellent trigger term coverage and clear completeness. The explicit 'Use quando' and 'Trigger em' sections make it very clear when to select this skill. The main weakness is that the capability descriptions could be more concrete (e.g., specifying output formats or specific deliverables).

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Product Owner) and lists several actions like 'definir requisitos de negócio, escrever user stories, critérios de aceitação, priorização de backlog', but these are somewhat general product management activities rather than highly specific concrete actions.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what (Product Owner skill for feature specification, writing user stories, acceptance criteria, backlog prioritization) AND when (explicit 'Use quando' clause plus 'Trigger em' with specific keywords).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'nova feature', 'especificação', 'user story', 'requisito', 'backlog', 'PO', 'definir escopo', 'critério de aceitação', 'MVP', 'roadmap'. These are terms users would naturally use when needing this skill.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche focused on Product Owner/product specification work with distinct triggers like 'PO', 'user story', 'backlog', 'MVP'. Unlikely to conflict with other skills due to specific product management terminology.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Implementation

57%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill provides a solid framework for Product Owner feature specification with good structure and appropriate external references. However, it lacks concrete, copy-paste-ready templates and explicit validation workflows. The content includes some generic advice (clean code section) that doesn't add value for this specific skill.

Suggestions

Add a complete, copy-paste-ready feature spec template with placeholder text showing exact format expected

Remove the 'Código Limpo' section as it's generic advice not specific to PO work

Add explicit validation steps: e.g., 'Before handoff: verify all acceptance criteria are testable by asking: can QA write an automated test for this?'

Include a concrete user story example with all required fields filled in, not just the acceptance criteria format

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary sections like 'Código Limpo' which is generic advice Claude already knows, and the governance references at the top add overhead without immediate value.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides good conceptual guidance (prioritization formula, acceptance criteria format) but lacks concrete executable examples. The DADO/QUANDO/ENTÃO example is helpful but there's no complete feature spec template that could be copy-pasted.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Lists responsibilities and handoff steps but lacks explicit validation checkpoints. The 'Evidencia de Conclusao' section hints at validation but doesn't integrate into a clear step-by-step workflow with feedback loops for iterating on specs.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Good structure with clear sections, appropriate references to external docs (docs/skill-guides/po-feature-spec.md) for extended examples, and well-organized content that doesn't overwhelm. References are one level deep and clearly signaled.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
felvieira/claude-skills-fv
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.