Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, actionable, and covers the PO feature-spec workflow thoroughly with concrete formulas, thresholds, and validation gates. Its main weakness is conciseness — the business-foundation section over-explains concepts Claude already knows.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Fundamento de Negócio' section: replace the book-derived theory explanations (MVP definition, Maslow, freemium economics, startup phases) with concise bullets, since Claude already knows these concepts.
Tighten the ideation-frameworks section by either inlining a concrete template for the recommended JTBD → HMW → SCAMPER → First Principles order or moving it entirely to the referenced guide.
Ensure referenced files (policies/vertical-slices.md, templates/deep-interview.md, docs/skill-guides/*) are bundled under references/ or clearly noted as external repo-consumer paths, so the progressive-disclosure links are verifiable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and actionable, but the 'Fundamento de Negócio' section explains business concepts Claude already knows (Maslow's pyramid, MVP definition, freemium economics, startup phases) at length, which is more than minor padding. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance — the prioritization formula with lookup tables, ambiguity formula with thresholds and MCP tool, and DADO/QUANDO/ENTÃO examples — with minor gaps where some sections (ideation frameworks) only name methods without concrete templates. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow from inputs through structure, ambiguity scoring, deep interview, and handoffs, with validation checkpoints (ambiguity > 0.7 → interview, stability ratio, readiness gate); minor gaps because validation is largely policy-referenced rather than self-contained. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to external files (skill-guides, policies/vertical-slices.md, templates/deep-interview.md); however no bundle files exist in references/scripts/assets, so the referenced paths point outside the skill bundle and cannot be verified. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |