Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-built playbook body: concrete commands, thresholds, an executable snippet, explicit validate-retry checkpoints, and a properly offloaded, verifiable Playwright reference file. The main improvements are trimming the inspiration quote and known-concept explanations, adding one concrete test example, and moving the mutation-testing deep-dive to its own reference file.
Suggestions
Move the mutation-testing deep-dive (tools-per-language table, workflow, thresholds, CI plug-in details) into a references/mutation-testing.md and keep a short trigger-based summary in SKILL.md.
Cut the inspiration attribution quote and the coverage-vs-mutation concept explanation — Claude already knows both; keep only the kit-specific thresholds and workflow.
Add one concrete, executable test example (e.g. a unit test for a hook or store) to the traditional-QA section so its guidance is copy-paste ready like the mutation and WAL snippets.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly dense, prescriptive content (tables, thresholds, commands, checklists) that assumes competence. Only minor trimmable padding: the 'Inspiracao: Birgitta Bockeler' quote and the coverage/mutation explanation ('Coverage normal mente: "80% das linhas tem pelo menos 1 teste passando por elas"') restate concepts Claude already knows. Below 5 because that over-explanation exists; above 3 because it is brief and the rest earns its tokens. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: concrete commands ('npx stryker run', 'pip install mutmut'), explicit mutation-score thresholds ('>85%: excelente / 70-85%: aceitavel / <70%: testes fracos'), a ready-to-use suggestion template, and a complete, copy-paste WAL cleanup code block. Not 5 because the traditional-QA sections stop at prescriptive lists (e.g. 'Escrever testes unitarios para hooks, stores e utils') with no concrete test example or Playwright MCP invocation command. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The mutation workflow is a clear numbered 8-step sequence with thresholds and CI cadence ('Diario (nao cada commit — caro)'), and the QA checklist has an explicit feedback loop: 'rodar a suite -> item que falhar, corrigir o teste ou reportar o bug ao dev -> rodar de novo. Repetir ate os 5 itens acima ser verdade'. Not 5 because the main unit/integration/E2E flow is only implied by section order rather than one explicit sequenced process with per-step validation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single bundle file, references/playwright-patterns.md, exists and is clearly signaled one level deep with an inline summary of its contents, and kit policies/docs are pointed to with 'apenas quando necessario' load hints. Not 5 because the substantial mutation-testing deep-dive (tools table, workflow, thresholds) is inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into a reference, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |