Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body has a strong skeleton: a high-density quick-reference table, a concrete decision tree, and explicit completion criteria that double as validation. However, the detailed payload (the 9 antipatterns and alternative examples) lives in two referenced files that are absent from the bundle, and roughly 15% of the body is duplicated meta content (handoff/pipeline sections, repeated external-system criterion). Fixing the dangling references would lift both actionability and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced files: add anti-patterns.md and alternatives.md to the bundle (or inline condensed bad/good examples for the top antipatterns), since the 'Guia Detalhado' section currently links to files that do not exist and the Evidencia de Conclusao depends on the 9-antipattern list they contain.
Deduplicate the meta sections: merge 'Handoff' and 'Integracao com Pipeline', which both state that Frontend Engineer (skill 04) consults the checklist and Reviewer (skill 11) uses it as a quality criterion — one section suffices.
State the 'sistema externo' criterion once in the intro and trim its restatements in 'Quando Nao Usar' and 'Quando DE FATO precisa de Effect', and cut the 'Quando Usar' bullets that repeat the two-moments paragraph verbatim.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Core guidance is dense and high-signal (Quick Reference table, decision tree), but there is notable duplication: "Effects sao uma valvula de escape... servem pra sincronizar com um sistema externo" is restated in "Quando Nao Usar" and "Quando DE FATO precisa de Effect"; the two-moments intro ("Esta skill entra em dois momentos: (1)... (2)...") repeats verbatim as the first two "Quando Usar" bullets; and "Handoff — Frontend Engineer (skill 04) — recebe o código já revisado" duplicates "Integracao com Pipeline — Frontend Engineer (04): consultar antes de escrever useEffect novo". This is more than minor trimming (anchor 4) but far from padded tutorial prose (anchor 2). | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, situation-specific direction throughout: the Quick Reference table maps each case to an exact alternative ("useState + useEffect" → "Calcular durante o render", "useEffect com setState" → "key prop", fetch → "useEffect com cleanup OU lib de fetch"), and the decision tree yields a definite verdict per branch. Not a 5 because the body contains no before/after code — the examples are deferred to anti-patterns.md — so it tells you which API to use but never shows the pattern; per the code-vs-instruction note this stays at mostly-executable rather than fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow is coherent and has explicit validation: two entry points ("ao escrever um useEffect novo, como checklist antes de commitar; ao revisar codigo/PR"), a decision procedure (the Arvore de Decisao), and a completion checkpoint ("Evidencia de Conclusao — código revisado não tem useEffect cobrindo um dos 9 antipadrões... toda sincronização com sistema externo restante está justificada"). Not a 5 because the final verification depends on the 9-antipattern list in anti-patterns.md, which is not present in the bundle, so the checklist cannot be fully executed from the skill as provided. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The design is right — a lean overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep, accurately annotated references ("[anti-patterns.md](./anti-patterns.md) — 9 antipatterns com exemplo ruim/bom lado a lado", "[alternatives.md](./alternatives.md) — as alternativas em detalhe") — but neither referenced file exists in the bundle (no references/ directory, only SKILL.md present), so both links dangle and the bulk of the detailed guidance is unreachable. Missing core referenced files is more than a minor organization gap (anchor 4); the body structure itself is far better than anchor 3's 'not clearly signaled' case, but navigation fails at runtime. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |