seo-specialist

Skill do Especialista SEO para otimização de páginas e sistemas para motores de busca. Use quando precisar otimizar meta tags, Open Graph, sitemap, schema markup, Core Web Vitals, performance, imagens, fontes, acessibilidade para SEO, ou qualquer decisão de ranqueamento. Trigger em: "SEO", "meta tags", "Open Graph", "sitemap", "schema markup", "Core Web Vitals", "performance", "LCP", "CLS", "ranking", "canonical", "robots.txt".

Quality

82%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong skill description that excels across all dimensions. It provides specific concrete actions, comprehensive trigger terms that users would naturally use, explicit 'Use when' and 'Trigger em' clauses, and highly distinctive SEO-specific terminology that minimizes conflict risk with other skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'otimizar meta tags, Open Graph, sitemap, schema markup, Core Web Vitals, performance, imagens, fontes, acessibilidade para SEO'. These are concrete, actionable SEO optimization tasks.	3 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both what (optimize meta tags, Open Graph, sitemap, schema markup, etc.) AND when ('Use quando precisar otimizar...' plus explicit 'Trigger em:' clause with specific keywords). Has explicit trigger guidance.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say, explicitly listing: 'SEO', 'meta tags', 'Open Graph', 'sitemap', 'schema markup', 'Core Web Vitals', 'performance', 'LCP', 'CLS', 'ranking', 'canonical', 'robots.txt'. These are terms users naturally use when discussing SEO.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Clear SEO niche with highly specific triggers like 'schema markup', 'Core Web Vitals', 'LCP', 'CLS', 'canonical', 'robots.txt'. These are distinct SEO-specific terms unlikely to conflict with general web development or content skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Implementation

64%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a comprehensive SEO skill with excellent actionable code examples and clear technical guidance. The main weaknesses are verbosity (governance sections, responsibility lists) and missing validation workflows - there's no explicit 'run Lighthouse, check score, fix issues, re-run' loop despite SEO being a validation-heavy domain.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation workflow: 'Run PageSpeed Insights → If LCP > 2.5s → Check image optimization → Re-run' with specific tool commands

Move detailed code examples (schema components, OptimizedImage) to a separate reference file and keep only the most essential example inline

Remove or condense 'Responsabilidades' section - the checklist already covers these items more actionably

Add specific validation commands: 'npx lighthouse https://... --output=json' or 'curl -I url | grep canonical' for verification steps

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The skill contains some unnecessary sections like 'Quando Usar/Nao Usar' and 'Responsabilidades' that could be trimmed. The code examples are good but the introductory text and governance references add bulk without proportional value.	2 / 3
Actionability	Excellent executable code examples throughout - complete TypeScript components for meta tags, schema markup, optimized images, fonts, and third-party scripts. All code is copy-paste ready with proper imports and types.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The skill provides comprehensive checklists but lacks explicit validation steps and feedback loops. The handoff sections describe what to deliver but don't specify how to verify SEO implementations are correct before handoff.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	References external docs (seo-specialist.md, GLOBAL.md, policies/) but the main file is quite long (~300 lines) with inline content that could be split. The structure is good with clear sections, but detailed code examples could be in separate reference files.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: felvieira/claude-skills-fv
Commit: 524725e

Reviewed: 5 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.