Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A rich, well-structured skill body with genuinely decision-forcing content, clear mode separation, and explicit validate-fix-rerun loops. Its weaknesses are token bloat in the provenance/fontes narrative and re-taught concepts, plus bundle-integrity gaps where referenced checker scripts and data files are missing.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Fontes' section to a short citation list: the provenance methodology narratives (how sources were verified, what was grep-measured against the kit) are meta-commentary, not instructions, and consume a large share of the skill's token budget.
Fix bundle integrity: either include `scripts/check-design-generic.mjs`, `scripts/check-contrast.mjs` and the `data/*.csv` catalogs in the bundle, or remove the copy-paste invocations that depend on them; also correct example paths to match the actual layout (`scripts/design_search.py`, not `skills/02-ui-ux-design/scripts/design_search.py`).
Link `references/forms-and-transactions.md` explicitly where forms are discussed instead of the oblique parenthetical "(auditoria, marketing, produto, formulário)", and cut the inline placeholder blue/gray color ramps down to the semantic-layer pattern they exist to illustrate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core sections (anchors, color derivation, empty states, interactive states, checklists) are dense and decision-forcing, but there is real padding: the ~16-paragraph "Fontes" provenance narrative ("confirmado via gh api", "medido por grep contra o kit"), glossed re-explanations of concepts Claude already knows (Nielsen's 10 heuristics, definitions of Hick-Hyman/Fitts/Miller/Gestalt), and a full 11-step placeholder blue/gray ramp the file itself declares is not a default. Not 2 because the majority of tokens still earn their place; not 4 because the unnecessary sections are substantial, not minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: concrete `design_search.py` CLI invocations with domains, a complete TypeScript token block, a component spec template, and a checker loop with exit-code semantics. Not 5 because `scripts/check-design-generic.mjs` and `scripts/check-contrast.mjs` are given as copy-paste commands but are absent from the bundle, and example paths (`skills/02-ui-ux-design/scripts/...`, `data/stacks/*.csv`) do not match the bundled layout. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequencing with explicit validation and feedback loops: two sharply separated modes (draw vs. audit), a non-negotiable build order ("semântica → tokens → primitivas → ... → motion"), lo-fi→hi-fi wireframe staging, and the closing loop "rodar os dois checkers → se algum falhar (exit 1), corrigir ... → rodar de novo. Repetir até os dois passarem limpo" with a rule against delivering on red. This matches the anchor-5 pattern. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The 8 files in references/ are one level deep and each is signaled in the body with when/why to load it (e.g. "carregar `references/audit-framework.md`", "abrir só ao avaliar/configurar uma biblioteca"). Not 5 because `references/forms-and-transactions.md` is never linked by name (only implied by "formulário"), and two referenced scripts plus the `data/` directory do not exist in the bundle, leaving broken navigation pointers. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |